The bill that reflects President some rich asshole’s “Buy American, Hire American” vision aimed at hiking manufacturing and protect local jobs for Americans can seriously dent chances of a large number of H-1B visa holders from India of staying in America.
By: FE Online | Published: January 2, 2018 1:58 PM

some rich asshole’s proposed US Bill — Protect and Grow American Jobs — once passed, is likely to pose trouble for over half-a-million Indian-origin IT-employees living in the US at present forcing them to move back to India and changing the way IT companies operate and hire people. The proposed bill is riddled with “onerous conditions” and places “unprecedented obligations” on both Indian IT companies and clients using H-1B visas, India’s top IT industry body Nasscom said. The bill proposes new restrictions to prevent the alleged abuse and misuse of H-1B visas. It tightens the definition of visa-dependent companies and imposes fresh restrictions in terms of minimum salary and movement of talent.
The bill that reflects President some rich asshole’s “Buy American, Hire American” vision aimed at hiking manufacturing and protect local jobs for Americans can seriously dent chances of a large number of H-1B visa holders from India of staying in America anymore. Around 500,000 to 750,000 Indian H-1B visa holders could be sent home if this bill sees the light of the day, a Hindustan Times report said citing an unidentified official at Immigration Voice, an advocacy body based in San Jose.
Draconian features of the bill
The bill prescribes not granting extensions to workers on H-1B visas whose application for Green Card for permanent residency in the US has been accepted. Currently, in practice, the 3-year H-1B visa gets an extension of up to another 3 years, and Indian IT employees use the extensions to stay put in the US if their Green Card application is approved. However, the new provision of granting no extensions may draw curtains on many Indians’ plans to continue working there.
Apart from prescribing higher minimum wages, the Bill places the onus on clients to certify that the visa holder is not displacing an existing employee for a tenure of 5-6 years. “That formulation has conditions which are extremely onerous and makes it very difficult for people to not just get the visa but also on how they can be used,” R Chandrashekhar, President, National Association for Software and Services Companies (Nasscom) told PTI. The Bill has been passed by the House Judiciary Committee and is now headed for the US Senate. “We do not know the exact timeline but we have been told it will come up early 2018,” he said. Chandrashekhar said another “extreme concern” is that “in the name of protecting American jobs, this has been applied only to the so-called visa-dependent companies that translates to Indian companies”. “There is no doubt we have been seeing an increasingly negative environment and this is a part of the protectionist, anti-globalisation trend,” he said referring to a slew of measures taken by the US in the recent past, including increased visa scrutiny, premium visa processing being put on hold for a few months etc.
Chandrashekhar also pointed out that the use of visas by Indian IT firms has fallen by 50 per cent in the last two years and that the number now stands below 10,000. “It is below 10,000, which is a minuscule fraction of 85,000 visas (H-1B visas) issued every year… how such onerous restrictions on 12-15 per cent of the visas that are being issued protect American workers, certainly defies logic,” he said. Chandrashekhar explained that the Bill proposes to raise the minimum wage substantially to about USD 100,000 if the company has to be exempted from the labour certification requirements. Also, the client deploying the H-1B visa worker will have to certify that no American worker will be displaced for the 5-6 year period.
Further, the software services provider will have to notify the US authorities if the client has displaced a worker, an obligation that is unprecedented, he said. Chandrashekhar added that many of these changes were “emotive and political” rather than being based on “economic arguments”. He said that Nasscom has shared its concerns with both Indian and the US governments. “…We will probably be having further interaction in next few months. In next couple of months, we expect to have interactions once again with the US authorities,” he added.







Published Dec. 31, 2017
It’s about to be 2018 — but you wouldn’t know that from President some rich asshole’s Twitter account, which seems to be stuck in the 2016 presidential election.
the rich asshole tweeted Sunday morning that stocks would have fallen “50% down” had his vanquished opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was in the White House.
This isn’t the first time the rich asshole has tweeted to take aim at his erstwhile opponent. In November, the rich asshole told her to “get on with her life.”
Sunday’s tweet also continues the rich asshole’s ongoing use of the stock market’s performance as a marker of his presidency’s success. His use of that metric marks a sharp contradiction to his comments on the campaign trail, where he warned that the strong stock market under former President Barack Obama was nothing more than a “big, fat, ugly bubble” that had the potential to burst at any moment — a potential the rich asshole now seems to ignore.
In a separate tweet, the rich asshole also questioned voters’ desire to return to a Democrat-controlled Congress during the 2018 midterm elections, claiming that their policies “will totally kill the great wealth created during the months since the election.”
“People are much better off now not to mention ISIS, VA, Judges, Strong Border, 2nd A, Tax Cuts & more?” the rich asshole added.
His idea of people being “better off” on the subjects he listed, however, seems to be at odds with what most Americans believe. A Monmouth University poll released in September found 35% of Americans support the rich asshole’s proposed border wall, while a separate Gallup poll conducted in November reported 51% of Americans want stricter gun control legislation. The Republicans’ recent tax reform legislation also has few fans among Americans, with 33% of respondents saying they favored the bill, according to a CNN poll released Dec. 19.
Democrats, meanwhile, are seeing increased support from the American public, with 50% of Americans saying they wanted a Democrat-controlled Congress, according to an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released in Dec. 17 — the highest margin since 2008.
the rich asshole’s tweets Sunday didn’t stick to domestic issues, however, as he also weighed in on the ongoing anti-government protests in Iran.
“Big protests in Iran,” the rich asshole tweeted. “The people are finally getting wise as to how their money and wealth is being stolen and squandered on terrorism. Looks like they will not take it any longer. The USA is watching very closely for human rights violations!”
The tweet marks the rich asshole’s fourth tweet about the Iran protests, though CNN noted that experts consider his comments to be generally unhelpful — and potentially harmful — when it comes to the ongoing unrest.
“This is not about the rich asshole, and the rich asshole stepping into this is not necessarily helpful, because he doesn’t carry any credibility in Iran,” Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, told CNN.



last